NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
ON AIR NOW: Michael Medved 2 - 5:00PM  Listen now!
Trouble Launching Stream?
Sign Up
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Brent Bozell III :: Townhall.com Columnist
McCain vs. "Destiny"
by Brent Bozell III
Forward Print Share Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Do you think America’s greatest days are still ahead?

John McCain has figured out that one way to build enthusiasm among conservatives is to confront his former best friends in the liberal media. As the media glorify Barack Obama the "statesman" on his trip abroad, with the three network anchors lining up for interviews like a gaggle of smitten fan-club presidents, the McCain campaign suddenly acquired a surprising "Annoy The Media" flavor.

Like many Obama-loving press outlets, Newsweek has reported that McCain's campaign is struggling against an Obama crusade that seems "blessed by destiny." This spin is maddening. The Obama campaign has been blessed by a media that arrogantly aspires to be the manufacturers of our destiny, and make history by beating the electorate senseless with glowing Obama coverage.

McCain is learning that the best way to fight the "destiny" makers is to take them on directly. The Drudge Report revealed that after The New York Times published an op-ed by Obama on July 14 laying out his thoughts on Iraq, McCain submitted an op-ed in reply. But the Times rejected it. David Shipley, the deputy editorial page editor, suggested that McCain's article wasn't constructive enough to publish.

"It would be terrific to have an article from Senator McCain that mirrors Senator Obama's piece," Shipley wrote. "To that end, the article would have to articulate, in concrete terms, how Senator McCain defines victory in Iraq. It would also have to lay out a clear plan for achieving victory with troops levels, timetables and measures for compelling the Iraqis to cooperate."

Republicans and conservatives quickly smelled that Shipley -- a former Clinton aide and New Republic executive editor -- wanted McCain to resubmit an article that "mirrored" Obama's views. But what the Times really refused to tolerate was any criticism of their precious prince Obama. Announce your own plan for Iraq, fine, but don't try to grace our pages by saying Obama "mangled the evidence" and has "learned nothing from recent history," as McCain's rejected op-ed stated. McCain's piece would be rejected for prose disparaging Obama's position: "In 2007 he wanted to withdraw because he thought the war was lost. If we had taken his advice, it would have been."

But Shipley had no problem publishing Obama's article, which bashed McCain for bad judgment in voting for the "grave mistake" of war in Iraq, and claiming that McCain wanted permanent bases in Iraq, like our presence in South Korea. While Shipley demanded McCain recommend a timetable for withdrawal, McCain was clear in his rejected article that he thought a rigid timetable was unwise, even dangerous.

The New York Times is out of control. On a regular basis, the news department makes headlines for outrageously biased non-news, such as the incredibly scummy story in February alleging that McCain had a sexual relationship with lobbyist Vicki Iseman despite the paper's utter lack of proof. Even their advertising department has gotten into the act. Recall how they made a sweetheart deal with MoveOn.org to slam Gen. David Petraeus as "General Betray Us." Now it's the op-ed department, refusing to give McCain the opportunity to respond to Obama because they don't like the response, period.

Meanwhile, over in TV land, the network anchors lined up for their chance to boost Obama's adventures. In the first days of the trip, it led all the network newscasts, and they praised him aggressively, down to the jump shots he made playing basketball in Kuwait. Now compare that to their coverage of McCain when he went abroad. On a trip in March, the networks amassed four stories in the entire week. CBS gave McCain's trip ... 10 seconds, 31 words.

When McCain went to Colombia and Mexico a couple of weeks ago, ABC beat him up. Five times over the course of two segments on July 2, various "Good Morning America" hosts, reporters and analysts emphasized that McCain's trip might result in voters thinking he didn't care about the domestic economic situation. Robin Roberts began her interview: "So, why is Senator McCain abroad when Americans are focused on the economy here at home and losing jobs, more and more jobs?" McCain said the drug trade in Colombia is a serious issue for Americans. But Roberts just plowed ahead, and asked again why on Earth he would go to South America. ABC didn't want an answer. ABC wanted people to resent McCain for leaving the country.

McCain's campaign is now running Internet ads mocking Chris Matthews for his "thrill up the leg" comments about Obama and other assorted media goo, complete with Frankie Valli crooning "Can't Take My Eyes Off You" in the background. It's quite clear that the media are hypersensitive about any mockery of Obama. So mocking his pitter-patter valentines in the media may be the best hardball he can throw.

Share:
Forward Print Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate

Join The Debate!

Post Your Comment
(47 comments so Far)
View in ascending order     View in descending order
Reply # 1
Date: Jul 27, 2008 - 8:01 PM EST
Subject: The media: left wing "propaganda" agent
It happened back in the days when I understood little about the political process: In awe and anger I said to myself: "This guys are electing Bill Clinton" to the White House. And a came to pass. I paid more attention since then, and realized that the leaders of the Republican party were to blame for this. Why? They let it happen. I think is time that the media is brought front and center and unmasked for what they are, as they did when Rather tried his smeare agains Bush, utilizing fabricated information; like they recently did with the NY times, when they tried to smear McCain with the infidelity scandal, or the NY Times refusal to publish McCain's piece. But more needs to be done by every single republican that is given the opportunity to appear in any of the mayor leftist channels. Unmask them when they ask questions that are formulated on false premises, and tell them right on their faces, while their audience is watching that they are using either falsehoods or allegations as if they were already corroborated facts. The few concienscious republicans in Congress and Senate need to come out swinging and denounce everything is been done to obstruct confirmation of judges, or opening opportunities for drilling domestically. Come up with a list of congressional action that over the years prevented this nation to be energy self sufficient. Let it rip. I think there is still enough time to minimize the losses in congress in the comming mayor election. Otherwise, it will be a set back for all of us. If a falsehood is hammered in the media as a truth, denouce it and plaster it all over the media channels, as much as possible. I believe, there is enough of us really listening. What we do not have enough of is republicans with the guts of Ann Coulter denouncing relentlessly, false and biased reporting by th main stream media, the bigest leftist propagada agent I've seen.
Flag as Offensive

Reply # 2
Date: Jul 27, 2008 - 7:53 PM EST
The media: left wing "propaganda" agent
It happened back in the days when I understood little about the political process: In awe and anger I said to myself: "This guys are electing Bill Clinton" to the White House. And a came to pass. I paid more attention since then, and realized that the leaders of the Republican party were to blame for this. Why? They let it happen. I think is time that the media is brought front and center and unmasked for what they are, as they did when Rather tried his speared agains Bush, utilizing fabricated information; like they recently did with the NY times, when they tried to smear McCain with the infidelity scandal, or the NY Times refusal to publish McCain piece. But more needs to be done by every single republican that is given the opportunity to appear in any of the mayor leftist channels. Unmask them when they ask questions that are formulated on false premises, and tell them right on their faces, while their audience is watching that they are using either falsehoods or allegations as if they were already corroborated facts. The few concienscious republicans in Congress and Senate need to come out swinging and denounce the everything is been done to obstruct confirmation of judges, or opening opportunities for drilling domestically. Come up with a list of congressional action that over the years prevented this nation to be energy self sufficient. Let it rip. I think ther is enough time to minimize the losses in congress in the comming mayor election. Otherwise, it will be a set back for all of us. If a falsehood is hammered in the media as a truth, denouce it and plaster it all over the media channels, as much as possible. I believe, there is enough of us really listening. What we do not have enough republicans with the guts of Ann Coulter denouncing relentlessly, false and biased reporting by th main stream media.
Flag as Offensive
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!